docs(hardware): clarify TC2 physical-vs-BCM pin mapping and validation
This commit is contained in:
+9
-6
@@ -39,13 +39,16 @@ Unknowns are marked `TBD` instead of guessed.
|
||||
- Raspberry Pi drives each relay channel independently.
|
||||
- Thermocouple boards are connected to Pi GPIO.
|
||||
|
||||
## GPIO Wiring (User-Confirmed)
|
||||
- Thermocouple channel 1 GPIO lines: `GPIO 5`, `GPIO 8`, `GPIO 7`.
|
||||
- Thermocouple channel 2 GPIO lines: `GPIO 11`, `GPIO 12`, `GPIO 13`.
|
||||
- Channel 2 thermocouple mapping corresponds line-for-line to channel 1 mapping (`5/8/7` -> `11/12/13`).
|
||||
- Relay control (channel 2): `GPIO 9`.
|
||||
## GPIO Wiring (Clarified)
|
||||
- Thermocouple channel 1 (as originally noted): `GPIO 5`, `GPIO 8`, `GPIO 7` (BCM numbering).
|
||||
- Thermocouple channel 2 was written as `11,12,13`; this has been clarified as **physical header pins**.
|
||||
- Thermocouple channel 2 validated mapping:
|
||||
- Physical pins `11,12,13` => BCM `17,18,27`.
|
||||
- Read test on BCM `17,18,27` returns valid MAX6675 words with open-thermocouple fault bit set when probe is disconnected (expected).
|
||||
- Alternate interpretation (BCM `11,12,13`) returned all-zero frames and appears incorrect for channel 2.
|
||||
- Relay control (channel 2): `GPIO 9` (BCM).
|
||||
- `TBD`: confirm relay control GPIO for channel 1 in this dual-channel prototype wiring doc.
|
||||
- Note: these dual-channel GPIO assignments differ from the current single-channel `piNail2/config.json` runtime pins.
|
||||
- Note: these dual-channel assignments differ from the current single-channel `piNail2/config.json` runtime pins.
|
||||
|
||||
## Monitor Subsystem
|
||||
- Separate 12V power supply for the built-in monitor.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user